What was Nigel de Jong worth?Value by season, 2009–2018
Nigel de Jong (CDM / CM, Netherlands) is on file for 8 seasons, from 2009–10 at Manchester City to 2017–18 at 1.FSV Mainz 05. His value peaked at £18.2M in 2011–12 — £75.7M in today’s transfer money.
Fees in today's money (transfer inflation). Wages over a three-season deal. Extras are entirely fictional — we checked.
Season by season
| Season | Club | Age | Rating | Value then | Fee today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Manchester City | 25 | 83 | £11.1M | £51.9M |
| 2010-11 | Manchester City | 26 | 84★ | £15.4M | £68.1M |
| 2011-12 | Manchester City | 27 | 82 | £18.2M | £75.7M |
| 2012-13 | AC Milan | 28 | 78 | £10.5M | £40.9M |
| 2013-14 | AC Milan | 29 | 79 | £6.0M | £21.1M |
| 2014-15 | AC Milan | 30 | 78 | £8.1M | £25.3M |
| 2015-16 | AC Milan | 31 | 72 | £5.8M | £15.1M |
| 2017-18 | 1.FSV Mainz 05 | 33 | 71 | £1.8M | £3.3M |
Rating: that season (Hardcore); ★ = his peak, what he plays at in Classic if signed that season (one point less per season away, never below that season's rating). Value then: market value at the time (nominal £). Fee today: adjusted for transfer-market inflation.
Eleven signings from 2009–18 at what they cost then, in today's money. Nine Premier League champions to beat.
Teammates in 2011–12
The most valuable players alongside him at Manchester City in 2011-12.
| Player | Pos | Age | Rtg | Value then | Fee today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergio AgüeroST · 23 | ST | 23 | 88 | £34.7M | £144.4M |
| Carlos TevezST · 27 | ST | 27 | 83 | £34.7M | £144.4M |
| David SilvaCAM · 25 | CAM | 25 | 87 | £29.5M | £122.7M |
| Yaya TouréCM · 28 | CM | 28 | 88 | £25.2M | £104.8M |
| Edin DžekoST · 25 | ST | 25 | 83 | £24.3M | £101.1M |
| Samir NasriCAM · 24 | CAM | 24 | 85 | £22.6M | £94.0M |
| Vincent KompanyCB · 25 | CB | 25 | 87 | £21.7M | £90.3M |
| Mario BalotelliST · 21 | ST | 21 | 80 | £20.8M | £86.5M |
Questions on file
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2009-10?
In 2009–10, Nigel de Jong was valued at £11.1m at Manchester City, aged 25. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £51.9m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2010-11?
In 2010–11, Nigel de Jong was valued at £15.4m at Manchester City, aged 26. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £68.1m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2011-12?
In 2011–12, Nigel de Jong was valued at £18.2m at Manchester City, aged 27. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £75.7m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2012-13?
In 2012–13, Nigel de Jong was valued at £10.5m at AC Milan, aged 28. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £40.9m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2013-14?
In 2013–14, Nigel de Jong was valued at £6m at AC Milan, aged 29. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £21.1m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2014-15?
In 2014–15, Nigel de Jong was valued at £8.1m at AC Milan, aged 30. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £25.3m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2015-16?
In 2015–16, Nigel de Jong was valued at £5.8m at AC Milan, aged 31. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £15.1m fee in today's money.
Q.How much was Nigel de Jong worth in 2017-18?
In 2017–18, Nigel de Jong was valued at £1.8m at 1.FSV Mainz 05, aged 33. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £3.3m fee in today's money.
Q.When was Nigel de Jong worth the most?
Between 2009-10 and 2017-18, Nigel de Jong's highest value was £18.2m in 2011–12, at Manchester City.
Q.What is Nigel de Jong's rating in 9-0-0?
In Classic, Nigel de Jong plays at his peak rating of 84 if you sign him in his best season (2010-11), one point less for each season away from it, never below that season's rating (2009-10: 83, 2010-11: 84, 2011-12: 83, 2012-13: 82, 2013-14: 81, 2014-15: 80, 2015-16: 79, 2017-18: 77). In Hardcore he plays at the rating of the season you sign him (2009-10: 83, 2010-11: 84, 2011-12: 82, 2012-13: 78, 2013-14: 79, 2014-15: 78, 2015-16: 72, 2017-18: 71).