What was Mame Diouf worth?Value by season, 2009–2018

Mame Diouf (ST / RW, Senegal) is on file for 9 seasons, from 2009–10 at Manchester United to 2017–18 at Stoke City. His value peaked at £9.3M in 2013–14 — £32.6M in today’s transfer money.

PEAK VALUEST
Market value at the time
£9.3M
Hannover 96 · 2013–14 · Age 26
RATING75that seasonClassic 76 · Peak 77 (2012-13)
Fee in today's money£32.6M
Wages, 3-season deal£32.4M
PRICE IN 9-0-0£65.0M

Fees in today's money (transfer inflation). Wages over a three-season deal. Extras are entirely fictional — we checked.

Season by season

SeasonClubRatingValue thenFee today
2009-10Manchester United66£2.2M£10.3M
2010-11Manchester United72£2.6M£11.5M
2011-12Manchester United69£3.5M£14.6M
2012-13Hannover 9677★£4.0M£15.6M
2013-14Hannover 9675£9.3M£32.6M
2014-15Stoke City77★£7.2M£22.5M
2015-16Stoke City74£7.3M£19.0M
2016-17Stoke City72£6.6M£14.2M
2017-18Stoke City75£6.1M£11.1M

Rating: that season (Hardcore); ★ = his peak, what he plays at in Classic if signed that season (one point less per season away, never below that season's rating). Value then: market value at the time (nominal £). Fee today: adjusted for transfer-market inflation.

£900m. Nine champions.

Eleven signings from 2009–18 at what they cost then, in today's money. Nine Premier League champions to beat.

Sign him in 9-0-0

Teammates in 2013–14

The most valuable players alongside him at Hannover 96 in 2013-14.

Hannover 96 2013-14 teammates
PlayerRtgValue thenFee today
Ron-Robert ZielerGK · 2478£7.2M£25.3M
Lars StindlCF · 2577£6.0M£21.1M
Artjoms RudnevsST · 2574£5.5M£19.3M
Didier Ya KonanST · 2972£4.2M£14.7M
Manuel SchmiedebachCDM · 2575£3.0M£10.5M
MarceloCB · 2673£2.5M£8.8M
Szabolcs HusztiLM · 3077£2.5M£8.8M
Andre HoffmannCB · 2070£2.5M£8.8M

Questions on file

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2009-10?

In 2009–10, Mame Diouf was valued at £2.2m at Manchester United, aged 22. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £10.3m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2010-11?

In 2010–11, Mame Diouf was valued at £2.6m at Manchester United, aged 23. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £11.5m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2011-12?

In 2011–12, Mame Diouf was valued at £3.5m at Manchester United, aged 24. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £14.6m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2012-13?

In 2012–13, Mame Diouf was valued at £4m at Hannover 96, aged 25. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £15.6m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2013-14?

In 2013–14, Mame Diouf was valued at £9.3m at Hannover 96, aged 26. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £32.6m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2014-15?

In 2014–15, Mame Diouf was valued at £7.2m at Stoke City, aged 27. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £22.5m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2015-16?

In 2015–16, Mame Diouf was valued at £7.3m at Stoke City, aged 28. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £19m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2016-17?

In 2016–17, Mame Diouf was valued at £6.6m at Stoke City, aged 29. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £14.2m fee in today's money.

Q.How much was Mame Diouf worth in 2017-18?

In 2017–18, Mame Diouf was valued at £6.1m at Stoke City, aged 30. Adjusted for transfer-market inflation, that's a £11.1m fee in today's money.

Q.When was Mame Diouf worth the most?

Between 2009-10 and 2017-18, Mame Diouf's highest value was £9.3m in 2013–14, at Hannover 96.

Q.What is Mame Diouf's rating in 9-0-0?

In Classic, Mame Diouf plays at his peak rating of 77 if you sign him in one of his best seasons (2012-13, 2014-15), one point less for each season away from the nearest, never below that season's rating (2009-10: 74, 2010-11: 75, 2011-12: 76, 2012-13: 77, 2013-14: 76, 2014-15: 77, 2015-16: 76, 2016-17: 75, 2017-18: 75). In Hardcore he plays at the rating of the season you sign him (2009-10: 66, 2010-11: 72, 2011-12: 69, 2012-13: 77, 2013-14: 75, 2014-15: 77, 2015-16: 74, 2016-17: 72, 2017-18: 75).